Any and all operational capabilities aside, their ability to deliver a desirable and relatable proposition starts with degree of brand “permission.” How much permission we, as Whole Foods customers, fans or fanatics give them to extend their brand into this arena.
Which circles back to how you filled in the blank. And not to limit your choices, but here’s a general framework for you to consider. Is Whole Foods a product-based, expertise-based or philosophy-based brand idea?
Is it a grocery brand, an expert purveyor of organic, natural, healthy foods or a brand defined by a deeper philosophy? Likewise, is it functionally-based or is it emotionally-charged? Not up to me to say, but they’ll cover the necessary bases to find out.
If you read the article, you’ll see that there’s a comparison to Canyon Ranch. Though not sure this is the most appropriate or wisest comparison, as Canyon’s roots are in spa/health and wellness, so their’s was a natural progression to integrate “eating habits” into their program.
Relative to other grocery retailers, Whole Foods does stand apart. It’s driven by, and delivers on, a strong set of value and beliefs. It hasn’t strayed from selections which advance a healthy lifestyle. It does business with a strong sense of purpose. Is this enough “permission”, we’ll see.
What’s your point-of-view?